Academic Integrity

Ensuring academic integrity is an educational objective we take very seriously at DeVry University. Based on respect for individual academic achievement, each student and faculty member commits to being a part of a community of scholarship that prides itself on honesty and integrity. The following information, paraphrased from the Academic Integrity policy, is provided in its entirety along with the Code of Conduct policy in the Student Handbook.

Students have a responsibility to maintain both the academic and professional integrity of the University and to meet the highest standards of academic and professional conduct. Students are expected to do their own work on examinations, class preparation, and assignments and to conduct themselves professionally when interacting with fellow students, faculty, and staff. Students must also make equitable contributions to both the quality and quantity of work performed on group projects.


Academic and/or professional misconduct is subject to disciplinary action, including being placed on probation, failing a graded course component, failing a course, or being dismissed. Student academic misconduct includes, but is not limited to, cheating on examinations, plagiarism, bribery, falsification of student records, and improper attempts to influence instructors or School officials.

The following explanations may be helpful in interpreting what are considered to be violations of the Academic Integrity policy specifically related to taking examinations, completing course assignments and projects, and writing research reports.

Examinations: Using unauthorized notes, looking at another student's test paper, or providing another student with answers during an examination or quiz are violations of the policy.

Course Assignments and Projects: Collaborating with another student on assignments intended to be completed independently or submitting another student's work as your own are violations of the policy unless a course assignment is specifically designated as a group or team assignment.

Research Reports: Using another person's ideas, words, expressions, or findings in your writing without acknowledging the source is plagiarizing. A writer who does not provide appropriate credit when quoting or paraphrasing another's writing is guilty of plagiarism and in violation of the policy.

Online Courses: Submitting others' work, entering discussions under false pretenses, or not complying with instructor or Online Educational Center authorship rules are violations of the policy.


 

Attendance Policy

Note: The state of Nevada requires attendance to be taken for all students enrolled at a Nevada location.

Class interaction is an integral part of graduate-level practitioner-based programs. DeVry University’s graduate student attendance policy is operational in nature and consists of tracking attendance during the first two weeks of the session only, for the purpose of identifying an official enrollment count.

Students who never participate during the first two weeks of a course are dropped from that course for non-participation. Students dropped from all courses because of non-participation should note that they are also dropped from courses in which they are enrolled for future sessions.

Though attendance is not tracked after the first two weeks of the session, professors may choose to incorporate a participation element when calculating student grades. Grading criteria include requirements for class participation in academic events and the extent to which work missed due to non-participation can be made up.

Students in an online course who anticipate missing more than a seven-consecutive-calendar-day period of class participation should contact the professor as soon as possible and should seek academic advising. Online class participation includes submitting class assignments, participating in threaded discussions, completing quizzes and exams, completing tutorials and participating in computer-assisted instruction.

Students in a blended or onsite course who anticipate not being able to attend onsite class meetings or participate in online activities for more than a seven-consecutive-calendar-day period should contact their professor as soon as possible and should seek academic advising. 

Final grades of F and designators of U are evaluated at the end of the session for students who receive one of the following:

  • All grades of F
  • All designators of U
  • All grades of F and designators of W
  • All designators of U and designators of W
  • All grades of F and designators of U
  • All grades of F, designators of U and designators of W

 

DeVry presumes students who receive a passing grade, or who earned a grade of F or a designator of U, in one or more courses taken during the session completed the course(s) and thus earned the grade(s)/designator(s).

Students who receive F grades or U designators in all of their courses because of lack of participation are administratively withdrawn from the course, and the midpoint of the session is assigned as the withdrawal date. Additionally, students receiving Veterans Education Benefits who do not formally withdraw from class and subsequently receive a grade of F or a designator of U due to lack of participation are administratively withdrawn, resulting in a W for each affected course. A student’s last login date for the course is considered the effective withdrawal date recorded in VA-ONCE.

Withdrawals

During the session, students may withdraw from a course, or from all courses, by requesting a course withdrawal from their student support advisor or academic advisor, or from an appropriate academic administrator verbally, by email or by submitting a request through the interactive student communication system. Students who inquire about a withdrawal are contacted to confirm their intention to withdraw. Students are withdrawn from their course(s) if they cannot be reached or do not respond regarding their inquiry. 

Students who do not formally withdraw from class and subsequently receive a grade of F or a designator of U due to lack of participation will be administratively withdrawn, resulting in a W on the transcript for each affected course. Additionally, the designator of W appears on the transcript of students who formally withdraw from an individual course or from all courses.  

The withdrawal deadline is Friday of week seven at 11:59 pm MT. Withdrawal is not allowed after this time.

 

Disability Accommodations in Academic Programs

DeVry is committed to maintaining an academic environment free of discrimination and complies with Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. DeVry will make reasonable accommodations to afford students with disabilities full and equal enjoyment of DeVry’s programs and services. DeVry makes no assumptions concerning any individual’s abilities or disabilities and makes an individual assessment to determine whether each student’s needs can be met at DeVry.

Any student or applicant with a disability who requests academic adjustments, auxiliary aids or accommodations under Section 504 should contact the Office of Student Disability Services to begin the accommodation request process. The Office of Student Disability Services can be reached by email at adaofficer@devry.edu or adaofficer@keller.edu, or by phone at ( 877 ) 496-9050, option 3. The applicant/student will be given an accommodation request form to complete and submit to the Office of Student Disability Services along with supporting medical, psychological or educational documentation.

Once an accommodation has been approved, the student will be notified by the Office of Student Disability Services. Campus, center and online instructions for obtaining approved accommodations may vary. Refer to the individual approval letter for instructions. Should a student need additional accommodations, requests must be submitted in writing to the Office of Student Disability Services. Should a student experience difficulty in obtaining accommodations, the student should notify the Office of Student Disability Services for assistance in rectifying the situation.

When a student alleges that he/she has been subjected to an act, rule, procedure, class requirement or practice in an academic program that involves discrimination based on his/her qualifying disability, the Student Complaint Procedure outlined in the student handbook should be followed.

 

Plagiarism

Plagiarism is a serious academic and professional offense. To avoid plagiarizing, err on the side of documenting too much. Pay special attention to online sources-just because a text is available on the World Wide Web, it is not necessarily public domain or common knowledge. As you read, synthesize ideas, and write, consider the complicated ways knowledge is created and the difficult nature of defining ownership of ideas or combinations of words.

Of particular importance to your learning experience is the study and analysis of previously established practices, theories, or ideas that may be considered "knowledge." As you study the established scholarship of your field and as you begin to participate in the reading and writing of your profession, you become a member of a discourse community-a group of people who read and write about the same topics. In this professional peer group, you will synthesize, criticize, juxtapose, and otherwise use words and ideas of other authors as a basis analysis and discussion. You will support and create arguments and further contribute to existing knowledge and technology by participating in a continuing conversation or dialectic; others may eventually cite your work as part of this ongoing conversation.

As a graduate student and professional in your field, you are naturally encouraged to read, write, and test ideas in your discourse community. Part of your responsibility as a student is treating the sources of your information with respect. Reading, studying, and synthesizing a body of knowledge is critical to the learning process. Read all that you can and write copiously, but do so with academic integrity-always cite your sources.

When conducting research and incorporating others' work into your own projects and papers you must cite the sources of quotes, paraphrases, summaries, concepts, and ideas that are not distinctly your own. Knowledge is created when people build on the work of others; the others, however, must be given credit for their contributions. As you incorporate and weave into your own work the support necessary to creating an effective text-regardless of its purpose or audience-you must cite all sources of your information.

While submitting an original paper that was awarded credit in one class for credit in another class is not plagiarism in its literal sense, this act may aid in the circumvention of important course objectives and thus prevent an optimum learning experience. To ensure competency in all Terminal Course Objectives, you may request to submit an assigned graded paper from one class for credit in a second class only if the following conditions are met. The course instructor must

  1. Obtain a copy of the original graded paper
  2. Approve use of the previously written paper as the basis for continued research
  3. Approve changes of content or research emphasis

Further, the new, resulting paper must be written so that no more than approximately one-fourth (25%) of the content is verbatim from the original paper.

Acknowledging your sources will benefit not only you, but also everyone concerned. Citing your sources allows you, as an author, to:

  • Acknowledge your dependence on previously established facts and information
  • Take credit for the research and information that belongs to you
  • Invite your readers to evaluate your work
  • Allow your readers to look further at your sources
  • Orchestrate others' ideas and words as a way to learn

As you embark upon a research project of any kind, reduce your risk of plagiarizing by following good research work habits such as:

  • Taking and keeping good notes
  • Summarizing and paraphrasing appropriately
  • Recording bibliographic information completely and accurately
  • Learning to synthesize thoughts and ideas instead of cutting and pasting
  • Creating a conversation between sources
  • Joining the conversation you are creating
  • Citing both primary and secondary sources
  • Reviewing and critiquing papers in study groups
  • Understanding the line between collaborating and plagiarizing

The research paper and documentation guide that has been identified as a resource for DeVry graduate students is Writing the Research Paper: A Handbook 7th ed. by Anthony C. Winkler and Jo Ray McCuen, which provides necessary formats for citing sources of all kinds. This book is available from the online bookstore and contains information about citation systems suitable for students in the fields of business and management. This book includes information on the following styles: APA, MLA, CEE, CMS, and Columbia Online. Students can use any of these five styles unless otherwise instructed to use one of them exclusively. Below are two tutorials covering two of the five acceptable styles.

APA Guidelines for Citing Sources

This tutorial provides a resource for citing references in papers using the current edition of the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association.

The following is covered within the tutorial: the purposes of APA documentation, guidelines and examples on how to cite original sources in the text of your paper using parenthetical citations, and how to format the reference list and an entire paper.

MLA Guidelines for Citing Sources

MLA style provides writers a system of cross-referencing their sources and protecting them from accusations of plagiarism. This tutorial goes over the purposes of MLA documentation, as well as methods and examples for using parenthetical citations, and how to format a Works Cited page.

Visit the Writing Center for APA resources and examples of APA formatting.


Your instructor may ask to see research work at various stages of its development. With the text as a reference and your instructor's guidance, you will be able to cite outside sources of any type, appropriately.

Students who have purchased the University's previous official style guide entitled, The Business Student Writers Manual and Guide to the Internet, by Thomas P. Bergman, Stephen M. Garrison, and Gregory M. Scott, will NOT be required to purchase another style guide.

Students agree that by taking this course all required papers may be subject to submission for textual similarity review to Turnitin.com for the detection of plagiarism. All submitted papers will be included as source documents in the Turnitin.com reference database solely for the purpose of detecting plagiarism of such papers. Use of the Turnitin.com service is subject to the Terms and Conditions of Use posted on the Turnitin.com site.

At the bottom of this page are some examples of plagiarism for a text and for a computer program; review them so you are familiar with various forms and levels of plagiarism. Take responsibility for an education grounded in the fair use of words and ideas.

 

Discussions: Policies, Standards, and Guidelines

Key to the learning process in an online educational environment are the interactions among students, the interaction between faculty and students, and the collaboration in learning that results from these interactions. In a DeVry University online or blended course, the primary way this is accomplished is through the use of "discussions."

We believe online discussions are critical to the success of a top-quality DeVry University online or blended course. Why? Because online discussions mirror the discussions that take place in a site-based DeVry classroom. Online discussions take place asynchronously with each student posting or commenting by logging in to the class at different times. Students initiate discussions, ask questions, react to other students, respond to ideas shared by others in the class, and become more creative in their own learning process. This interaction not only allows students to grow cognitively but collegially. Discussions provide for the formation of learning communities, communities where knowledge is imparted and meaning is co-created, thereby setting the stage for the accomplishment of learning outcomes.

To gain maximum benefit from discussions and to ensure a common understanding of student and faculty expectations, the following policies, standards, and guidelines apply:

  • Students are expected to log in and participate in weekly discussion activity at least every other day. In the majority of courses, participation at least every other day is necessary if students are to meaningfully interact on discussion issues presented in class. In other courses, it is necessary for students to complete readings and problem assignments prior to meaningful participation and thus the "every other day" requirement may be appropriately interpreted as 3 days per week.
  • Students are expected to fully participate in the "discussion." This means that, in addition to posting a response to the topics presented, students are expected to respond to comments and questions from the instructor and/or other students.
  • Instructors are expected to publish grading criteria for discussions in their courses. The criteria vary depending on course content and learning objectives. Students are held accountable for meeting discussion grading criteria.
  • Courses will include anywhere from one to three discussion topics per week, plus a wrap-up topic. The number of posts per topic may vary with the type of course (qualitative vs. quantitative in nature) and the percentage weight given to the discussions in calculating the final course grade. The number of posts per topic and the percentage weight will be left up to the discretion of the faculty members.
  • Quality indicators for discussion posts will need to be spelled out in the course syllabi under the grading policy of the discussions. Examples of what constitutes a quality posting will have to be written out for the benefit of both students and faculty members. Examples: Did the student include a practitioner example? Did the student post a website? Did the student ask questions of his or her fellow classmates? Did the student give a personal example? Did the student bring in something from the textbook, or from some outside reading, to support his or her opinion? The faculty member is looking to see how well the students support their opinions pertaining to the topics and how well they interact with their classmates.
  • Instructors are expected to participate in weekly discussions a minimum of four times per week in each discussion topic and no less than every other day.
  • A discussion is a conversation and not a "chat room." The instructor is expected to facilitate discussions between student and instructor, student and student, and groups of students. The role of the instructor is not to answer every comment or question but to frame issues and extend the discussions through leading and directed questions.
  • Discussions give students the opportunity to accomplish one of DeVry's institutional objectives: to strengthen students' ability to communicate effectively both orally and in writing. Keeping this educational objective in mind, both students and instructors are expected to write posts that are well thought out, well written, and apply the principles of effective communication.
  • Students and instructors are expected to conduct themselves professionally when interacting with one another in discussions. To this end, they are expected to follow the "Net Etiquette" guidelines that can be found in the Course Policies/Forms section of any online or blended course.
  • Participation in the discussions each week is an important part of the learning process. However, sometimes unavoidable circumstances (please see list below) make that participation impossible. In those cases, DeVry University has a process to allow students to make up participation points for a week of discussion participation by writing a four-to-five page paper. This paper must summarize the discussions missed and add material to show mastery of the topics discussed, integrating that mastery with the TCO(s) for the week. If you find that you cannot meet the class' minimum discussion requirements due to such a circumstance, please contact your instructor as soon as possible. Your instructor will forward your request to the appropriate DeVry personnel.
    The administration will review the request, and may make accommodations to students under the following circumstances:
    • In the event that the area in which a student resides experiences an extended power outage due to a natural disaster (hurricane, flood, storm, etc.)
    • A student is on active military duty and cannot complete coursework
    • A student has a verifiable medical or other personal emergency
  • Discussions will always close Sunday, 11:59 p.m. Mountain Time (MT).

Key Guidelines on Grading of Online Discussions

In the discussion areas of the course, you, as a student, can interact with your instructor and classmates to explore questions and comments related to the content of this course. A successful student in online education is one who takes an active role in the learning process. You are therefore encouraged to participate in the discussion areas to enhance your learning experience throughout each week.

The discussions will be graded for the following two criteria:

1. Frequency—Number and regularity of your discussion comments. Students are expected to log into the course and post (respond) in the discussion topics on a minimum of three separate days per week in each graded discussionbeginning no later than Wednesday.

2. Quality—Content of your contributions. Examples of quality posts include:

  • providing additional information to the discussion
  • elaborating on previous comments from others
  • presenting explanations of concepts or methods to help fellow students
  • presenting reasons for or against a topic in a persuasive fashion
  • sharing your own personal experiences that relate to the topic
  • providing a URL and explanation for an area you researched on the Internet

Full credit is awarded when both high quality and required frequency is met.

If students have any questions or need further clarification of the above, they should contact their Student Services Advisor at http://help.devry.edu.

 

Late Assignment Policy

Late work is strongly discouraged. Turning in work late can impair your chances of success in the course. However, DeVry University understands that life and emergencies do happen, and thus, we offer this late policy:

For serious emergencies, your instructor will decide whether your late work may be accepted for full or reduced credit. Serious emergencies include: serious illness, accidents, natural disasters, eCollege server outages, etc. E-mail your instructor the information about your emergency and request approval to make up the assignment, lab, quiz, or exam. If you receive approval, make up the work according to the plan set by you and your instructor.

For all other matters, i.e. work, technical, or other personal issues, your instructor will decide whether your late work may be accepted. Your instructor will impose a per diem late penalty of 5% of the assignment points per day up to seven days. For late work make-up which is not emergency-based, you should request approval BEFORE the final deadline. If homework solutions are shared with the class, your instructor reserves the right to decline to accept late work after the sharing of the solutions, or to require that an alternative assignment be completed, if one is available. Only one non-emergency late submission will be allowed per student per course.

This late work policy applies to all graded assessments (including Final Exams) in the course with the exception of the discussions, which require approval of the College faculty management administrators. See the "Policies" item in Course Home for information regarding the discussions make-up policy.

 

Minimum System Requirements

Sufficient technology and Internet access is required to access online coursework.  The minimum system requirements for students in online or blended courses are available at: http://www.devry.edu/online-education/system-requirements.html

 

Computer Virus Disclaimer

"Students have a responsibility to maintain both the academic and professional integrity of the School, and to meet the highest standards of academic and professional conduct." Any intentional, willful or reckless transferring of viruses, as the result of an email message or attachment will be considered professional misconduct. Professional misconduct is subject to disciplinary action including being placed on probation, failing a graded course component, failing a course, or being dismissed from the School. DeVry will not be liable to any affected student for any indirect, special, incidental or consequential damages that may occur as a result of this type of misconduct by any person.

 

Netiquette Guidelines

DeVry University has specified the following guidelines for participation in the Discussion Area and Chatrooms.

  1. Read carefully what you receive to make sure that you understand the message.
  2. Read carefully what you send, to make sure that your message will not be misunderstood.
  3. If you are using humor or sarcasm, make sure to clearly label it as such. Humor on this list should be indicated by an emoticon. For example: 8) :-) :-). Well-intended sarcasm is seldom effective online.
  4. Remember that the absence of cues associated with face-to-face communication provides for an environment where it's easy to misunderstand what is being said.
  5. Know your audience. Make sure that the person, or list of people, you are sending your message to is the appropriate one(s) with whom to communicate.
  6. Be tolerant of newcomers. None of us were born knowing all.
  7. Do not abuse new users of computer networks for their lack of knowledge. Be patient as they first learn to crawl, then walk.
  8. Avoid cluttering your messages with excessive emphasis (such as stars, arrows and the like). It may make the message hard to follow.
  9. If you are responding to a message, either include the relevant part of the original message in your message, or make sure you unambiguously refer to the original's contents. It's very possible that people will read your reply to the message before they read the original. Do not quote more than necessary to make your point clear. Please do not quote the entire message.
  10. Be specific, especially when asking questions.
  11. Always, always put your name in the text of your message, and also your best Email address for a reply. The end of the message is a good place for your name and Email address.
  12. If your messages can be typed in UPPER and lower case, please use the two appropriately instead of all UPPERCASE characters. This gives the appearance of shouting and makes the message less readable.
  13. Remember that not all readers have English as their native language, so make allowance for possible misunderstandings and unintended discourtesies.
  14. Don't start a ''flame war'' unless you're willing to take the heat. Just as you shouldn't drive when you are angry, you should not send e-mail responses when you are mad at someone. Go ahead and type a response, but do not mail it until the next day. Chances are that when you come back later to read your response, you'll be glad that you did not send it.
 

Communication Competency

Successful students, employees, and managers must have effective written and oral communication skills. Therefore, communication errors, such as improper grammar, improper sentence and paragraph structure, misspelling and incorrect punctuation, are unacceptable in coursework. Although course grades focus on concepts and skills developed, faculty members also consider communication competency when evaluating student performance.

 

Communication Tools

There are many opportunities to cooperate and collaborate with fellow students and your instructors. The communications tools you will have include:

  1. Discussions are (usually graded) components of a course’s weekly assignments. The discussions simulate traditional classroom discussions. A discussion allows you to post comments to a discussion topic, react to other students' comments, and respond to ideas shared by your instructor or by others in the course.

Most discussions begin with a topic identified by your instructor. Discussions take place asynchronously: you can log into the course whenever you want and then post to the discussion topic at your convenience.

  1. Email: From any page in your course, click the Email course tool at the top of the screen. You can send your email to All Class Members, groups of students that have been set up within the course, the instructor, a single class member, or to multiple class members.
  2. Chat Rooms. From any page in your course, click the Chat course tool at the top of the screen. Like a regular online chat room, the Chat tool lets you, your instructor, and other students in your course communicate with each other in real time. You or your instructor can use the discussions or e-mail messages to set up a specific time to have a live chat. Remember to consider time zone differences when finalizing times.
 

Getting Help

Academic Help

If questions or problems arise while students are working on an assignment, they can email their instructor. Instructors are required to respond within two business days.

Technical Help

If students are unable to get to the "course page," technical assistance is available through:

  1. Tech Support at: phone # 800-594-2402, or
  2. The Help Desk at: helpdesk@devryu.net
 

Final Exams

All final exams are administered online. Final exams can be taken any time, any day between the ending Sunday of week 7 and Saturday of week 8.

All final exams will be timed. Once the time limit of 3 hours, 30 minutes has been reached, the student will be exited from the final exam. Students should watch the time closely and save Answers frequently. Answers that are entered but not saved prior to the time limit will be lost. Final exam grades are available no earlier than 7 days after the close of the final exam.

Students have a responsibility to maintain the academic integrity of the University and to meet the highest standards of academic conduct. Students are expected to do their own work on exams, not use unauthorized resources, and to not provide others with answers to exam questions. We reserve the right to require a proctored final examination if there is an allegation of a student’s violating the DeVry University academic integrity policy.

All technical problems with exams must be worked out with the eCollege Help Desk. The student’s instructor is not responsible for solving such technical problems.

Any other issues should be addressed with the student's instructor.

 

Examples of Plagiarism

(Reprinted with permission from Princeton University)

The first set of examples provides a range of textual plagiarism from verbatim copying to thorough paraphrasing. The second set of examples demonstrates plagiarism of a computer program. The comments that follow the examples offer guidance about how a source may be used and when a source must be cited.

Original source (text)

Alvin Kernan
The Playwright as Magician. New Haven:
Yale University Press, 1979. pp.102-103.
From time to time this submerged or latent theater in Hamlet becomes almost overt. It is close to the surface in Hamlet's pretense of madness, the "antic disposition" he puts on to protect himself and prevent his antagonists from plucking out the heart of his mystery. It is even closer to the surface when Hamlet enters his mother's room and holds up, side by side, the pictures of the two kings, Old Hamlet and Claudius, and proceeds to describe for her the true nature of the choice she has made, presenting truth by means of a show. Similarly, when he leaps into the open grave at Ophelia's funeral, ranting in high heroic terms, he is acting out for Laertes, and perhaps for himself as well, the folly of excessive, melodramatic expressions of grief.

Text example 1

Verbatim plagiarism, or unacknowledged direct quotation (lifted passages are in boldface type):

Almost all of Shakespeare’s Hamlet can be understood as a play about acting and the theater. For example, there is Hamlet's pretense of madness, the "antic disposition" that he puts on to protect himself and prevent his antagonists from plucking out the heart of his mystery. When Hamlet enters his mother's room, he holds up, side by side, the pictures of the two kings, Old Hamlet and Claudius, and proceeds to describe for her the true nature of the choice she has made, presenting truth by means of a show. Similarly, when he leaps into the open grave at Ophelia's funeral, ranting in high heroic terms, he is acting out for Laertes, and perhaps for himself as well, the folly of excessive, melodramatic expressions of grief.

Comment
Aside from an opening sentence loosely adapted from the original and reworded more simply, this entire passage is taken almost word-for-word from the source. The few small alterations of the source do not relieve the writer of the responsibility to attribute these words to their original author. A passage from a source may be worth quoting at length if it makes a point precisely or elegantly. In such cases, copy the passage exactly, place it in quotation marks, and cite the author.

Text example 2

Lifting selected passages and phrases without proper acknowledgment (lifted passages are in boldface type):

Almost all of Shakespeare's Hamlet can be understood as a play about acting and the theater. For example, in Act 1, Hamlet adopts a pretense of madness that he uses to protect himself and prevent his antagonists from discovering his mission to revenge his father's murder. He also presents truth by means of a show when he compares the portraits of Gertrude's two husbands in order to describe for her the true nature of the choice she has made. And when he leaps in Ophelia's open grave ranting in high heroic terms, Hamlet is acting out the folly of excessive, melodramatic expressions of grief.

Comment
This passage, in content and structure, is taken wholesale from the source. Although the writer has rewritten much of the paragraph, and fewer phrases are lifted verbatim from the source, this is a clear example of plagiarism. Inserting even short phrases from the source into a new sentence still requires placing quotations around the borrowed words and citing the author. If even one phrase is good enough to borrow, it must be properly set off by quotation marks. In the case above, if the writer had rewritten the entire paragraph and only used Alvin Kernan's phrase "high heroic terms" without properly quoting and acknowledging its source, the writer would have plagiarized.

Text example 3

Paraphrasing the text while maintaining the basic paragraph and sentence structure:

Almost all of Shakespeare's Hamlet can be understood as a play about acting and the theater. For example, in Act 1, Hamlet pretends to be insane in order to make sure his enemies do not discover his mission to revenge his father's murder. The theme is even more obvious when Hamlet compares the pictures of his mother's two husbands to show her what a bad choice she has made, using their images to reveal the truth. Also, when he jumps into Ophelia's grave, hurling his challenge to Laertes, Hamlet demonstrates the foolishness of exaggerated expressions of emotion.

Comment
Almost nothing of Kernan's original language remains in this rewritten paragraph. However the key idea, the choice and order of the examples, and even the basic structure of the original sentences are all taken from the source. Although it would no longer be necessary to use quotation marks, it would absolutely be necessary to place a citation at the end of this paragraph to acknowledge that the content is not original. Better still would be to acknowledge the author in the text by adding a second sentence such as--"Alvin Kernan provides several examples from the play where these themes become more obvious"--and then citing the source at the end of the paragraph. In the case where the writer did not try to paraphrase the source's sentences quite so closely, but borrowed the main idea and examples from Kernan's book, an acknowledgment would still be necessary.

Original source (computer program)

Robert Sedgewick
The following program appears on page 118 of the textbook
Algorithms in C (Addison Wesley, New York, 1990)

       

   quicksort (int a[ ], int 1, int r)

   {

   int v, i, j, t;

   if (r > 1)

       {

         v = a [r]; i = 1-1; j = r;

         for (;;)

           {

                 while (a [++i] < v) ;

                 while (a [-j] > v) ;

                 if (i >= j) break;

                 t= a[ i ]; a[ i ] = a [r]; a [ r ] = t;

           }

         t = a [ i ]; a [ i ] = a [ r ]; a [ r ] = t

         quicksort (a, l, i-1);

         quicksort (a, i+1, r);

       }

   }

Computer program example 1

       

   mysort (int data[ ], int x, int y) {

       int pivot;

       int i, j;

       int temp;

 

       if (y > x) {

           pivot = data [ y ]; i = x-1; j = r;

           while (1) {

              while (data [ + + i ] < pivot) ;

               while (data [ - j ] > pivot) ;

               if ( i >= j) break;

               temp = data [ i ]; data [ i ] = data [ y ]; data [ y ] = temp;

           }

           temp = data [ i ]; data [ i ] = data [ y ]; data [ y ] = temp;

           mysort (data, x, i-1);

           mysort (data, i+1, y);

       }

   }

Comment
This example is plagiarism because the student has borrowed the structure of the original program exactly, while changing only a few details that do not affect the meaning of the program. Though the program looks different to the untrained eye, it has exactly the same meaning as the original program. The student has made the following changes:

  • Changed the names of the variables: a, l, r, v, and t are changed to data, x, y, pivot, and temp (respectively);
  • Replaced the construct "for ( ; ; )" with the equivalent construct "while (1)"
  • Changed the name of the procedure from "quicksort" to "mysort"
  • Changed the indentation and the division of program elements between lines.

The student's action can be compared to copying a block of text from a reference book with an occasional change in wording.

Computer program example 2

       

   #define Swap (A,B) { temp=(A); (A)=(B); (B)=(A); }

   void mysort (const int * data, int x, int y) {

   int temp;

   while (y > x) {

       int pivot = data [ y ];

       int i = x-1;

       int j = r;

       while (l) {

           while (data [ + + i ] < pivot) { /*do nothing*/ }

           while (data [ - j ] > pivot) { /*do nothing*/ }

             if ( i >= j) break;

                 swap (data [ i ], data [ y ];

           }

           swap (data [ i ], data [ j ];

           mysort (data, x, i-1);

           x = i+1;

           }

        }

Comment:
This example is also plagiarism. The student has made more changes to the program than in the first example, and some of this student's changes are even improvements to the program. Nevertheless, this student's program is clearly derived from the program in the textbook. The student's action in this case can be compared to paraphrasing a passage from a reference book.

 

In New York State, DeVry University operates as DeVry College of New York.